Filed 4/20/17 P. v. McLaughlin CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Placer)
----




THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

TROY MICHAEL MCLAUGHLIN,

Defendant and Appellant.


C081953

(Super. Ct. No. 62128844A)


Appointed counsel for defendant Troy Michael McLaughlin has asked this court to review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm the judgment.
On March 7, 2014, defendant and his codefendant Lacey Renee Holmes entered Gary Hall’s home, uninvited, through an unlocked door. Inside the home, defendant stole several items including jewelry, silverware, a Skilsaw, a credit card, and a flat screen television.
Following defendant’s arrest, the People charged him with one count of first degree residential burglary. Defendant pleaded no contest to the charge and admitted his criminal conduct violated his probation in four unrelated matters. In exchange, the People agreed defendant would serve a stipulated term of four years in state prison. The People also agreed defendant’s sentence for each of the probation violations would be served concurrent to his four-year term.
The trial court sentenced defendant to serve an aggregate term of four years in state prison, in accordance with the plea agreement. The court awarded defendant custody credit in each case and ordered him to pay various fines and fees. Following a contested restitution hearing, the court also ordered defendant to pay $22,180 in direct victim restitution to Gary Hall.
Defendant appeals; he did not seek a certificate of probable cause.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant.
Having examined the record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.



/s/
HOCH, J.



We concur:



/s/
MURRAY, Acting P. J.



/s/
RENNER, J.