legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mitchell

P. v. Mitchell
06:14:2006

P


P. v. Mitchell


 


 


Filed 5/18/06  P. v. Mitchell CA2/3


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


 


 


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION THREE







THE PEOPLE,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


JOSE PEPE MITCHELL, JR.,


            Defendant and Appellant.



       B179757


      (Los Angeles County


     Super. Ct. Nos. YA057740,


       BA267323 & BA270478)



            APPEAL from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David Mintz, Judge.  Affirmed.


            Robert L.S. Angres, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


            Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Linda C. Johnson and Gary A. Lieberman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


_________________________


            Defendant and appellant, Jose Pepe Mitchell, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered in case No.  BA270478, following his conviction by jury trial for petty theft (Pen.  Code, §  487).[1]  Mitchell claims there was trial error.[2]  Mitchell also appeals from the judgments entered following the revocation of his probation in case Nos. BA267323 and  YA057740.


            The judgments are affirmed.


BACKGROUND


            Viewed in accordance with the usual rule of appellate review (People v. Ochoa (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1199, 1206, the evidence established the following.


            On August  29, 1994, Los Angeles police officers conducted a so-called bait-car operation in the area of 47th  Street and McKinley  Avenue.  There had been numerous automobile thefts and break-ins in this area.  The bait car was a Honda Accord, outfitted with video and audio recording devices.  Officers pretended to arrest the driver of the Honda, which was left at the southeast corner of 47th and McKinley with the keys in the ignition and the windows rolled up.  There were two tires with 20-inch chrome rims visible on the back seat of the Honda.  There were two more tires with chrome rims in the Honda's trunk.  The trunk did not close all the way and it had been secured with a piece of twine.  One of the chrome rims in the trunk was clearly visible from the street.


            Officer Michael Barz and a partner were in plain clothes and watching the Honda from an S.U.V. parked about 50  feet away.  After 10 or 15  minutes, Arthur Jenkins approached the Honda.  Jenkins â€





Description A decision regarding conviction by jury trial for petty theft.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale