legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mizrahi

P. v. Mizrahi
01:16:2007

P. v. Mizrahi




Filed 8/31/06 P. v. Mizrahi CA2/5







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FIVE











THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


TIFFANY MIZRAHI,


Defendant and Appellant.



B187538


(Los Angeles County Super. Ct.


No. LA044977)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John Fisher, Judge. Affirmed.


David L. Polsky, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


_________________________________


Defendant and appellant Tiffany Mizrahi appeals from the judgment following a plea of no contest to a charge of carjacking (Pen. Code, § 215, subd. (a)). She was sentenced to state prison for three years. We appointed counsel to represent her on appeal.


After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. Appellant's counsel advised her she had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which she wished us to consider. On July 20, 2006, we advised appellant she had 30 days within which to file a supplemental brief. No response has been received to date.


We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and no arguable issues exist. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278-284; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)


The judgment is affirmed.


KRIEGLER, J.


We concur:


TURNER, P. J.


MOSK, J.


Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.


Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.





Description Defendant and appellant appeals from the judgment following a plea of no contest to a charge of carjacking.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale