P. v. Monestime
Filed 8/7/06 P. v. Monestime CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MAURICE M. MONESTIME, Defendant and Appellant. | H029071 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. F10940) |
Defendant, Maurice Monestime appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of corporal injury to a spouse (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)), one count of making a criminal threat (Pen. Code, § 422), and one count of dissuading a witness from reporting a crime (Pen. Code, § 136.1, subd. (b)(1)). After the trial court sentenced defendant to four years and eight months in prison and ordered defendant to pay fines, he filed a timely notice of appeal. We appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court.
Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which stated the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. We received a letter from defendant which summarizes his rendition of the facts, but makes no legal argument.
Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.
Disposition
The judgment is affirmed.
_____________________________________
rushing, P.J.
WE CONCUR:
_________________________________
PREMO, J.
_________________________________
ELIA, J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Real Estate Attorney.
