legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Morales CA2/6

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Morales CA2/6
By
12:24:2018

Filed 11/8/18 P. v. Morales CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ALVARO MORALES,

Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B289206

(Super. Ct. No. 2016043168)

(Ventura County)

A jury found Alvaro Morales guilty of possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code,[1] § 29800, subd. (a)(1)), possession of a firearm by a violent felon (§ 29900, subd. (a)(1)), possession of a short-barreled shotgun (§ 33210), and carrying a concealed firearm (§ 25400, subd. (a)(2)). The trial court sentenced him to seven years in state prison.

In December 2016, an Oxnard police officer saw Morales take a sawed-off shotgun out of his pants and place it under a car parked in the driveway of his mother’s house. Police entered the house, took Morales into custody, and retrieved the shotgun.

We appointed counsel to represent Morales in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. On August 27, 2018, we advised Morales by mail that he had 30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Morales’s attorney fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

TANGEMAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

YEGAN, J.

Ryan J. Wright, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Will Tomlinson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


[1] All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.





Description A jury found Alvaro Morales guilty of possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code, § 29800, subd. (a)(1)), possession of a firearm by a violent felon (§ 29900, subd. (a)(1)), possession of a short-barreled shotgun (§ 33210), and carrying a concealed firearm (§ 25400, subd. (a)(2)). The trial court sentenced him to seven years in state prison.
In December 2016, an Oxnard police officer saw Morales take a sawed-off shotgun out of his pants and place it under a car parked in the driveway of his mother’s house. Police entered the house, took Morales into custody, and retrieved the shotgun.
We appointed counsel to represent Morales in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. On August 27, 2018, we advised Morales by mail that he had 30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 5 views. Averaging 5 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale