P. v. Morga
Filed 6/7/07 P. v. Morga CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NOE MORGA, Defendant and Appellant. | H030889 (Monterey County Super.Ct.No. SS052415) |
Defendant Noe Morga pleaded nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, 11350, subd. (a)) and admitted suffering a prior strike conviction (Pen. Code, 1170.12, subd. (c)(1)) and serving one prior prison term (Pen. Code, 667.5, subd. (b)). He was sentenced to a 44-month term in the state prison. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendants brother, Andy Aguierre, was on probation with search terms. On August 21, 2005, Salinas police officers conducted a probation search of his residence. Officer James Godwin discovered defendant in a bedroom of the apartment and observed him making a tossing motion with his left hand in the direction of an open closet. The officer, upon later checking the closet, found a baggie containing a green leafy substance which he believed was marijuana. The officer then searched defendants person and found four bindles of white powder in his pants pocket. The powder tested presumptively positive for cocaine.
Defendant was charged by amended complaint with possession of a controlled substance, cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, 11350, subd. (a)), and with enhancements pursuant to Penal Code sections 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1) and 667.5, subdivision (b). The complaint also alleged misdemeanor possession of 28.5 grams or less of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, 11357, subd. (b)).
Defendant brought a motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5 which was heard concurrently with the preliminary examination. The motion was denied and defendant was held to answer on the felony charge.
An information was filed alleging the same charges and enhancements as pleaded in the amended complaint. Defendant brought a motion to set aside the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995 and a renewed [Penal Code section] 1538.5 motion. The trial court denied the motions.
PLEA AND SENTENCING
Defendant pleaded no contest to the charge of possession of cocaine and admitted one prior strike and one prior prison term. At the sentencing hearing the trial court heard and denied a motion brought pursuant to People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497. The misdemeanor charge was dismissed and defendant was committed to the state prison for a term of 44 months.
CONCLUSION
We appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court. Appointed counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf within 30 days. That time has elapsed and we have received no written argument from defendant. Pursuant to
People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.
The judgment is affirmed.
Duffy, J.
WE CONCUR:
Bamattre-Manoukian, Acting P.J.
Mihara, J.
Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.
Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line attorney.
