P. v. Morgan
Filed 5/25/10 P. v. Morgan CA1/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KARLA SUZANNE MORGAN, Defendant and Appellant. | A126422 (Napa County Super. Ct. Nos. CR140073 & CR142633) |
Karla Suzanne Morgan appeals from a judgment reinstating her on probation in two Napa County cases (case Nos. CR140073 & CR142633) following her admission of probation violations. Her attorney on appeal has raised no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We have conducted the requested review and conclude that there are no arguable issues.
Appellant was represented by counsel throughout the proceedings. Her no contest pleas to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, 11377) and possession of a concealed dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, 12020, subd. (a)) were validly entered in case No. CR140073. Her no contest plea to second degree burglary (Pen. Code, 459) in case No. CR142633 was also validly entered. She thereafter admitted violating her grant of probation by failing to submit to drug testing and by testing positive. She was again reinstated on probation on the condition that she waive custody credits, which she did. Waiver of custody credits to avoid a state prison commitment was proper.
Judgment affirmed.
_________________________
Reardon, J.
We concur:
_________________________
Ruvolo, P.J.
_________________________
Sepulveda, J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Property line Lawyers.
