P. v. Murry

Filed 3/13/06 P. v. Murry CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Jennifer R.S. Detjen, Judge.

Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

-ooOoo-

Appellant Ryan Murry pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) and, in 2002, the court placed appellant on five years' probation. In February 2005, appellant admitted allegations that he violated his probation by failing to obey all laws, changing his address without notification to the probation officer and failing to register as a drug offender. In March 2005, the court imposed the 16-month lower term on the instant offense.

Appellant's appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d. 436.) Appellant has not responded to this court's invitation to submit additional briefing.

Following independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.

The judgment is affirmed.

Publication courtesy of Santee minimum wages lawyer( http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/ )and Santee lawyers directory( http://www.fearnotlaw.com/)

* Before Wiseman, Acting P.J., Levy, J., and Cornell, J.