P. v. Nance CA3
abundy's Membership Status
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 06:01:2017 - 11:31:27
Biographical Information
Contact Information
Submission History
In re K.P. CA6
P. v. Price CA6
P. v. Alvarez CA6
P. v. Shaw CA6
Marriage of Lejerskar CA4/3
Find all listings submitted by abundy
By nbuttres
02:27:2018
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Yolo)
----
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
DELARA LARISHA NANCE,
Defendant and Appellant.
C085013
(Super. Ct. No. CR120211)
In January 2012, defendant used a knife and caused traumatic injury to the father of her child. She pled no contest to assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court suspended execution of sentence and placed defendant on three years’ formal probation. After multiple probation violations, proceedings were suspended because of doubts about defendant’s competence to stand trial. In October 2016, she was found incompetent to stand trial. In April 2017, she was found to have regained her competence. Defendant then admitted violating probation.
The trial court denied reinstatement of probation and sentenced her to two years in state prison for her assault with a deadly weapon conviction. The trial court deemed the sentence served based on presentence custody credits.
DISCUSSION
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record pursuant to Wende, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
/s/
Robie, Acting P. J.
We concur:
/s/
Duarte, J.
/s/
Hoch, J.
Description | In January 2012, defendant used a knife and caused traumatic injury to the father of her child. She pled no contest to assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court suspended execution of sentence and placed defendant on three years’ formal probation. After multiple probation violations, proceedings were suspended because of doubts about defendant’s competence to stand trial. In October 2016, she was found incompetent to stand trial. In April 2017, she was found to have regained her competence. Defendant then admitted violating probation. The trial court denied reinstatement of probation and sentenced her to two years in state prison for her assault with a deadly weapon conviction. The trial court deemed the sentence served based on presentence custody credits. |
Rating | |
Views | 14 views. Averaging 14 views per day. |