P. v. Navarro
Filed 11/17/06 P. v. Navarro CA2/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSE LUIS NAVARRO, Defendant and Appellant. | B189048 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA290591) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Ruth Ann Kwann, Judge. Affirmed.
Marilee Marshall, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Victoria B. Wilson and Jaime L. Fuster, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________________________
Jose Luis Navarro appeals the judgment entered following his plea of no contest to one count of unlawful possession of a firearm. (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1).) We reject Navarro's claim of error in the denial of his motion to suppress evidence and affirm the imposition of a three-year prison term.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing indicated that on September 21, 2005, at approximately 6:30 a.m., patrolling Los Angeles Police Officer Kelly Edwards saw Miguel Garcia driving a gold Honda with â€
