P. v. Negrete
Filed 6/21/06 P. v. Negrete CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ESPERANZA NEGRETE, Defendant and Appellant. | G036309 (Super. Ct. No. 96SF0790 ) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Richard F. Toohey, Judge. Affirmed.
Beatrice C. Tillman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * *
We appointed counsel to represent appellant on appeal. While not arguing against appellant she filed a brief which set forth the facts of the case and advised us she was unable to find an issue to argue on appellant's behalf.
We informed appellant she had 30 days to file written argument in her own behalf. She filed such an argument, with case citations, and we have reviewed it. But, we are nonetheless unable to identify any arguable issue. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.)
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
BEDSWORTH, J.
WE CONCUR:
SILLS, P. J.
FYBEL, J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Apartment Manager Lawyers.
