P. v. Park
Filed 8/9/06 P. v. Park CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDWARD T. PARK, Defendant and Appellant. | B187202 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA062170) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Francis J. Hourigan, Judge. Affirmed.
Rita L. Swenor, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
__________________________________
Defendant and appellant Edward T. Park appeals from the judgment following a jury trial resulting in his conviction of first degree residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). He was sentenced to state prison for four years. We appointed counsel to represent him on appeal.
After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. Appellant's counsel advised him he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. On June 23, 2006, we advised appellant he had 30 days within which to file a supplemental brief. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and no arguable issues exist. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278-284; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
KRIEGLER, J.
We concur:
TURNER, P. J.
ARMSTRONG, J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Real Estate Attorney.
