P. v. Parrish
Filed 3/27/06 P. v. Parrish CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JERRY RAY PARRISH, Defendant and Appellant. | E037589 (Super.Ct.No. BAF002412) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Russell F. Schooling, Judge. (Retired judge of the Mun. Ct. for the Southeast Jud. Dist. of L.A., assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6, of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.
Daniel G. Koryn, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Pamela Ratner Sobeck, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Ivy Fitzpatrick, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Over a four-day period, defendant repeatedly threatened his estranged girlfriend; when she said she was calling the police, he smashed her telephone, choked her, and punched her.
Defendant was found guilty of spousal battery (Pen. Code, § 273.5), dissuading a witness from reporting a crime (Pen. Code, § 136.1, subd. (b)(1)), damaging a telephone line (Pen. Code, § 591), and making criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422). He admitted two â€
