P. v. Patrick

Filed 9/29/06 P. v. Patrick CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE COURT^*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Michael B. Lewis, Judge.

Harry Zimmerman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

-ooOoo-

In June 2003, appellant Donald Patrick pled no contest to receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)). In July 2003, the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on three years’ probation, with various terms and conditions. In October 2005, the court found that appellant had violated his probation and, the following month, revoked probation and imposed a prison term of 16 months.

Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d. 436.) Appellant has not responded to this court’s invitation to submit additional briefing.

Following independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.

The judgment is affirmed.

Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.

Analysis and review provided by Escondido Property line attorney.

^* Before Wiseman, A.P.J., Cornell, J., and Gomes, J.