legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Patton

P. v. Patton
04:11:2006

P. v. Patton



Filed 4/7/06 P. v. Patton CA3




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(Yuba)


----








THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


CORY DOUGLAS PATTON,


Defendant and Appellant.





C049621



(Super. Ct. No. CRF04224)





Defendant Cory Douglas Patton pled no contest to possessing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11383, subd. (c)(1)). He was sentenced to the middle term of four years in state prison. In addition to imposing restitution fines and a $20 court security fee (Pen. Code, § 1465.8), the trial court ordered defendant to pay a criminal laboratory analysis fee pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 11372.5, subdivision (a), totaling $175.


Defendant appeals, claiming the trial court's order did not properly set forth the breakdown of the fee and penalty assessments as to the amount of the Health and Safety Code section 11372.5 fee, and that the amount exceeds the permissible amount by $5. The People concede the errors.


DISCUSSION


â€





Description A decision regarding possessing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale