P. v. Pichel
Filed 8/2/06 P. v. Pichel CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LYNDA PICHEL et al., Defendants and Appellants. | E037275 (Super.Ct.No. FVI 18962) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Stephen H. Ashworth, Judge. Affirmed.
Richard Power, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Reginald DeWayne Perkins.
Nancy J. King, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Lynda Pichel.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Gil Gonzalez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Lynne G. McGinnis, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
In separate appeals, consolidated for review, Lynda Pichel and Reginald DeWayne Perkins appeal judgments entered against them following a jury trial in which they were jointly tried and convicted of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a))[1] and kidnapping (§ 207, subd. (a)). The jury found not true the firearms enhancements (§§ 12022, subd. (d) & 12022.53, subd. (d)). The trial court further found true the prior â€
