P. v. Powell
Filed 6/7/06 P. v. Powell CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRANDON DAVID POWELL, Defendant and Appellant. | E037887 (Super.Ct.No. FSB048413) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. John N. Martin, Judge. Affirmed.
Amanda F. Benedict, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Robert M. Foster and Scott C. Taylor, Supervising Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)); in exchange, the remaining allegation was dismissed. Defendant was thereafter placed on formal probation for three years on various terms and conditions, including serving 90 days in county jail and submitting to and cooperating in field interrogations by any peace officer at any time. Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the probation condition requiring him to â€
