legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Prado

P. v. Prado
06:13:2006

P. v. Prado







Filed 6/8/06 P. v. Prado CA4/3




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


RUBEN PRADO,


Defendant and Appellant.



G035429


(Super. Ct. No. 04CF1283)


O P I N I O N



Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, M. Marc Kelly, Judge. Affirmed.


John F. Schuck, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, James D. Dutton and Randall D. Einhorn, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


* * *


Ruben Prado appeals from the judgment sending him to prison for three years, eight months after a jury convicted him of being a felon in possession of a gun for the benefit of a criminal street gang and street terrorism. (See Pen. Code, §§ 186.22, subds. (a)-(b), 12021, subd. (a)(1).)[1] Subsequent to the trial, Prado admitted he had a prior â€





Description A decision regarding a felon in possession of a gun for the benefit of a criminal street gang and street terrorism.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale