P. v. Pugh
Filed 1/29/07 P. v. Pugh CA2/3
NOT
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits
courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 977.
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
THREE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and
v.
JONATHAN PUGH,
Defendant and
| B188422
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA079670) |
APPEAL from
a judgment of the Superior
Court of Los Angeles County, Jack W. Morgan, Judge. Affirmed as modified.
John Doyle,
under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill
Lockyer, Attorney General, Mary Jo
Graves, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant
Attorney General, Susan D. Martynec and Kenneth N. Sokoler, Deputy Attorneys
General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_____________________
INTRODUCTION
A jury convicted
defendant and appellant Jonathan Pugh of, among other things, willful,
premeditated, and deliberate attempted
murder. On appeal, he contends there is insufficient evidence he intended
to kill the victim and of premeditation and deliberation. He also contends the
trial court erred in instructing the
jury and in sentencing him. Because defendant's sentence is improper, we
modify the judgment, but we otherwise affirm it.
FACTUAL AND
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
I. Factual background.
On February 1, 2005, April Burton and her mother, Beverly Cooks, were sitting in their car. They were parked in front of
a Honda that had belonged to Burton's father, whom Burton and Cooks were
looking for. While parked, they saw a car pull up, and a girl got out of the
car. They also saw defendant, who either got out of the car or came from one
of the nearby houses. Defendant had sold drugs to Burton's father.
A little while thereafter, Roshaun Flowers,
â€
Description | A jury convicted defendant of, among other things, willful, premeditated, and deliberate attempted murder. On appeal, he contends there is insufficient evidence he intended to kill the victim and of premeditation and deliberation. He also contends the trial court erred in instructing the jury and in sentencing him. Because defendant's sentence is improper, court modify the judgment, but court otherwise affirm it. |
Rating |