P. v. Purcell
Filed 3/29/06 P. v. Purcell CA3
Received for posting 5/3/06
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Glenn)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SHANE WARREN PURCELL, Defendant and Appellant. | C050712 Sup.Ct.No. 04NCR01144
|
Pursuant to a sentence bargain for three years in state prison, defendant Shane Warren Purcell pled guilty to false personation (Pen. Code, § 529). The court ordered this term to run consecutive to a four-year term defendant was already serving, for an effective total sentence of four years eight months.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
MORRISON , Acting P.J.
We concur:
ROBIE , J.
BUTZ , J.
Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Escondido Apartment Manager Lawyers.
