P. v. Rangel
Filed 8/31/06 P. v. Rangel CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSEPH RANGEL, Defendant and Appellant. | E040072 (Super.Ct.No. BAF3992) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Rodney L. Walker, Judge. Affirmed.
Leslie A. Rose, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On March 28, 2005, the District Attorney of Riverside County filed a five-count felony complaint against the defendant.
Thereafter, on December 5, 2005, the defendant pled guilty to a violation of Penal Code section 12020, subdivision (a), possession of a nunchaku; and Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a), possession of methamphetamine, as charged in counts 1 and 2 of the felony complaint. The defendant was sentenced to a 16-month prison term, less custody credits, to run concurrent to any other prison commitment. The remaining counts (3, 4 & 5) were dismissed on motion by the District Attorney and in the interests of justice pursuant to Penal Code section 1385.
Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
/s/ RAMIREZ
P.J.
We concur:
/s/ HOLLENHORST
J.
/s/ RICHLI
J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line attorney.
