P. v. Reado
Filed 3/16/06 P. v. Reado CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LANNY READO, Defendant and Appellant. | B184410 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA253302) |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, George G. Lomeli, Judge. Affirmed.
Boyce & Schaefer, Laura G. Schaefer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
Defendant, Lanny Reado, appeals from a judgment after he pled nolo contendere to voluntary manslaughter (Pen. Code,[1] § 192, subd. (a)) and admitted that the offense had been committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) Defendant was sentenced to prison for 11 years for the manslaughter conviction plus an additional 10 years for the gang enhancement. Defendant was ordered to pay a restitution fine of $200 and a parole revocation restitution fine of $200. (§§ 1202.4, subd. (b)(1), 1202.45.) Defendant obtained a probable cause certificate and appealed the conviction.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. After examination of the record, defense counsel filed an â€
