P. v. Richardson
Filed 8/23/06 P. v. Richardson CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANGUS RICHARDSON, Defendant and Appellant. | B184118 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA078665) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Jack W. Morgan, Judge. Affirmed.
Mark S. Givens, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Mary Sanchez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Katz, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
___________________________________________________
Appellant Angus Richardson was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1). After the trial court denied appellant's motion to suppress the firearm, he pled no contest to the charged offense and admitted a prior robbery charged as a strike. The trial court then sentenced him to a prison term of four years, based on double the midterm of two years pursuant to the Three Strikes law.
On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the loaded shotgun found in his residence after his arrest. Contrary to appellant's contention, the trial court properly ruled that the search was â€
