P. v. Robledo-Reyes
Filed 4/14/06 P. v. Robledo-Reyes CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SANDRA JANETTE ROBLEDO-REYES, Defendant and Appellant. | D047100 (Super. Ct. No. SCS193410) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jeffrey F. Fraser, Judge. Affirmed.
Sandra Janette Robledo-Reyes entered negotiated guilty pleas to two counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211)[1] and admitted a prior strike (§§ 667 subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, 668) a prior serious felony conviction (§§ 667 subd. (a)(1), 668) and personal use of a firearm during one of the robberies (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)). The court sentenced her to a stipulated 14 years in prison: double the two-year lower term for robbery with a prior strike, enhanced five years for the prior serious felony conviction, and the three-year lower term for personal firearm use with two years consecutive on the second conviction of robbery with a prior strike (double one-third the middle term). The court ordered her to pay a $20 court security fee, a $1,000 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a second $1,000 restitution fine, stayed unless parole is revoked (§ 1202.45), and $300 victim restitution (§ 1202.4, subd. (f)).[2] The record does not include a certificate of probable cause. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 30(b).)
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth the evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible but not arguable issues: (1) whether the 14-year sentence was cruel and unusual punishment; and (2) whether the trial court erred in ordering Robledo-Reyes to pay two security fees.
We granted Robledo-Reyes permission to file a brief on her own behalf. She has not responded. A review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, including the possible issues referred to pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Competent counsel has represented Robledo-Reyes on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
HALLER, Acting P. J.
WE CONCUR:
McDONALD, J.
AARON, J.
Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.
Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Apartment Manager Lawyers.
[1] All statutory references are to the Penal Code.
[2] Because Robledo-Reyes entered guilty pleas, she cannot challenge the facts underlying the convictions. (§ 1237.5; People v. Martin (1973) 9 Cal.3d 687, 693.) We need not recite the facts.
