Fear Not Law Articles: P. v. Rodriguez

P. v. Rodriguez

Filed 1/22/07 P. v. Rodriguez CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

RUDY RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

E039743

(Super.Ct.No. RIF122530)

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Bernard Schwartz, Judge. Affirmed.

Kevin D. Sheehy, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Rudy Rodriguez was convicted of six counts of second degree robbery and one count of attempted robbery arising out of a series of similar crimes that took place between March 6 and 16, 2005.

Defendant has appealed his convictions and this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. State of California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493], setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues, and requesting this court undertake a review of the entire record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief and he has provided one in the form of a personal letter.

We begin our independent review with a brief description of the underlying facts and procedural history.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 6, 2005, defendant went into a convenience store in Moreno Valley at 3:00 a.m. He wore a long, dark jacket. Defendant asked the clerk for $40, saying he needed it for a plane ticket to visit his mother, who was sick and dying. The clerk refused to give defendant any money. Defendant left and returned 30 minutes later. This time, defendant demanded the money, saying, â€

Description	Defendant was convicted of six counts of second degree robbery and one count of attempted robbery arising out of a series of similar crimes that took place between March 6 and 16, 2005. Defendant has appealed his convictions and this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. State of California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493], setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues, and requesting this court undertake a review of the entire record. Court offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief and he has provided one in the form of a personal letter. Court begin independent review with a brief description of the underlying facts and procedural history. The judgment is affirmed.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.