P. v. Rogers
Filed 4/28/06 P. v. Rogers CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES SAMUEL ROGERS, Defendant and Appellant. |
F048815
(Super. Ct. No. RF004538A)
OPINION |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Lee P. Felice, Judge.
Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Stan Cross and J. Robert Jibson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
INTRODUCTION
Appellant James Samuel Rogers contends the trial court erred in requiring him to pay restitution of $1,831.22, which sum represents the value of 20 days' leave time the mother of the infant victim was required to take in order to care for the victim. We will affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
On January 18, 2005, eight-week-old N. was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit of Loma Linda University Medical Center. N. was severely burned from the neck to his feet; skin had peeled off his stomach. The most likely cause was immersion in hot water. The burns required skin grafts.
N. additionally had multiple skull fractures caused by brute force; his forehead was bruised in a â€
