P. v. Romero
Filed 10/10/06 P. v. Romero CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LUIS ALFREDO ROMERO , Defendant and Appellant. | E040151 (Super.Ct.No. FCH7833) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Douglas M. Elwell, Judge. Affirmed.
Laura Furness, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Defendant pled guilty to possession of a firearm by an ex felon. (Pen. Code § 121021, subd. (a)(1).) As part of his plea bargain, he waived his right to appeal. He was sentenced to the agreed-to term of three years in prison. His request for a certificate of probable cause was granted by the trial court.
Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
RAMIREZ
P.J.
We concur:
McKINSTER
J.
MILLER
J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line attorney.