P. v. Ross
Filed 6/19/06 P. v. Ross CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. REGINALD ROSS, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B188115 (Super. Ct. No. TA079717-01) (Los Angeles County) |
|
|
Reginald Ross appeals from the judgment following his nolo contendre plea to sale/transportation of a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a).) Pursuant to the negotiated plea, appellant admitted suffering a prior felony conviction within the meaning of the Three Strikes law (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i); 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)).[1] The trial court sentenced appellant to 10 years state prison and ordered him to pay a $200 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a $200 parole revocation fine (§ 1202.45), a $20 court security fee (§ 1465.8, subd. (a)(1)), and a $50 lab fee (Health & Saf. Code, § 11372.5, subd. (a)).
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On May 24, 2006 we advised appellant that he had 30 days in which to personally submit any contentions that he wished to raise on appeal. On June 12, 2006 we received a letter from appellant stating, among other things, that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's appointed counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, Acting P.J.
We concur:
COFFEE, J.
PERREN, J.
Arthur M. Lew, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
James M. Crawford, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Apartment Manager Lawyers.
[1] All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated.
