P. v. Sanders
Filed 9/6/07 P. v. Sanders CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHNATHAN J. SANDERS, Defendant and Appellant. | D050524 (Super. Ct. No. SCD202064) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, David J. Danielson, Judge. Affirmed.
Johnathan J. Sanders entered a negotiated guilty plea to selling a person for illicit use (Pen. Code 266(f)). The trial court sentenced him to two years in prison. Sanders appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 23, 2006, police approached an 18-year-old woman who appeared to be engaging in prostitution activities. The woman began crying because she was being forced to engage in prostitution and wanted help in separating from Sanders, who was her pimp. The police monitored and tape-recorded a telephone call between the woman and Sanders, which supported her statement. Police arrested Sanders.
DISCUSSION
Appointed counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. She presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible but not arguable issues: (1) whether Sanders was adequately advised of the consequences of his guilty plea and the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty; and (2) whether the court awarded the proper number of custody credits.
We granted Sanders permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.
A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues referred to pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Sanders has been competently represented on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
Judgment affirmed.
HALLER, J.
WE CONCUR:
McCONNELL, P. J.
AARON, J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line Lawyers.
