P. v. Seeman
Filed 3/16/06 P. v. Seeman CA1/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RANDY DWAYNE SEEMAN, Defendant and Appellant. | A110796 (Mendocino County Super. Ct. Nos. SCUK-CRCR-04-62716, SCUK-CRCR-04-62738) |
Pursuant to a negotiated disposition for a state prison term of three years and eight months, appellant Randy Dwayne Seeman entered no contest pleas to two counts of driving under the influence with a prior felony conviction. (Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subd. (a), 23550.5, subd. (a)(1).) He was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated disposition.
Counsel for appellant has filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court for an independent review of the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We have conducted the requested review and conclude that there are no arguable issues.
Appellant was represented throughout the proceedings by counsel. His no contest pleas were entered after a full advisement of rights and consequences. He was sentenced to the agreed-upon state prison term. There was no sentencing error.[1]
Judgment affirmed.
_________________________
Reardon, J.
We concur:
_________________________
Ruvolo, P.J.
_________________________
Sepulveda, J.
Publication courtesy of Santee minimum wages Lawyer ( http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/ )and Santee lawyers directory( http://www.fearnotlaw.com/)
[1] Appellant has filed a supplemental brief in pro. per. The issues he seeks to raise were waived upon entry of his no contest plea.
