P. v. Shaw
Filed 7/26/06 P. v. Shaw CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COREY VINCENT SHAW, Defendant and Appellant. | B185916 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA032080) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, Christopher Estes, Judge. Affirmed.
Ronnie Duberstein, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Katz and Mary Sanchez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
____________________
Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, Corey Vincent Shaw pleaded no contest to one count of possession of a firearm by a felon and was sentenced to two years in state prison. On appeal Shaw contends the firearm discovered during a parole search of his residence was the fruit of an illegal detention and should have been suppressed. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
1. The Information
An information charged Shaw with one count of possession of a firearm by a felon and alleged he had suffered one prior serious or violent felony conviction within the meaning of the â€
