P. v. Shoop
Filed 10/19/06 P. v. Shoop CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Placer)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THOMAS CHARLES SHOOP, Defendant and Appellant. | C051978
(Super. Ct. No. 62-039135)
|
Defendant Thomas Charles Shoop pleaded no contest to false imprisonment. (Pen. Code, § 236.) In exchange, three related counts were dismissed. He was sentenced to state prison for 16 months, awarded 409 days of custody credit and 204 days of conduct credit (thus satisfying the prison term), and ordered to pay a $200 restitution fine (id., § 1202.4, subd. (b)) and a $200 restitution fine suspended unless parole is revoked (id., § 1202.45).
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
Disposition
The judgment is affirmed.
DAVIS , J.
We concur:
SIMS , Acting P.J.
HULL , J.
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line attorney.
