P. v. Stannard
Filed 7/28/06 P. v. Stannard CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM BRIAN STANNARD, Defendant and Appellant. | B184337 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. KA 069203 & KA 054323 |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Abraham Khan, Judge. Affirmed.
________
John L. Staley, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Victoria B. Wilson and Noah P. Hill, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________
William Stannard pleaded no contest to possessing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) and a hypodermic needle or syringe (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 4140). The information also alleged that in 1978 he was convicted of second-degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) which was a violent or serious felony under the Three Strikes Law. He waived a jury on the truth of the prior conviction. The trial court found that in 1978 he had been convicted of second degree burglary and that the burglary was of a residence and therefore constituted a violent or serious felony (a â€
