P. v. Suchil
Filed 8/9/06 P. v. Suchil CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LONGENE SUCHIL, Defendant and Appellant. | E037159 (Super.Ct.No. RIF116348) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Edward D. Webster, Judge. Affirmed.
Lisa M. Bassis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Barry Carlton, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Sharon L. Rhodes, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A jury found defendant guilty of stalking (Pen. Code, § 646.9, subd. (a)), dissuading a witness (Pen. Code, § 136.1, subd. (b)(1)), violating a protective order (Pen. Code, § 273.6, subd. (a)), petty theft (Pen. Code, §§ 484, 488), and simple battery (Pen. Code, § 242). It acquitted him on charges of assault with force likely to cause serious bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) and spousal battery (Pen. Code, § 243, subd. (e)(1)). The trial court sentenced defendant to a total of two years in prison.
Defendant now contends:
1. The trial judge â€
