legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Thomas

P. v. Thomas
02:15:2007

P


P. v. Thomas


Filed 1/10/07  P. v. Thomas CA5


 


 


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT







THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


                                              v.


MICHAEL LARUE THOMAS,


Defendant and Appellant.


F049032


(Super. Ct. No. F04907897-3)


 


O P I N I O N


                      APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County.  Edward Sarkisian, Jr., and Gary D. Hoff, Judges. 


Jeffrey S. Kross, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. 


                      Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Carlos A. Martinez and Virna L. DePaul, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. 


INTRODUCTION


                      During the evening of July 19, 2004, appellant Michael Larue Thomas fatally shot Dwayne Haron during a dispute concerning care of appellant's children. 


                      Appellant was convicted after jury trial of first degree murder and being a felon in possession of a firearm.  (Pen. Code, §§  187, subdivision (a), 1202.1).[1]  A special allegation that appellant personally discharged a firearm, causing death, was found true.  (§  12022.53, subd. (d).)  Appellant admitted a prior strike allegation.  (§§  667, subds. (a)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(e).)  He was sentenced to 80 years to life imprisonment. 


                      Appellant contends the court prejudicially erred by refusing his attorney's request for a trial continuance.  We disagree and will affirm. 


RELEVANT FACTS[2]


                      On June 2, 2005,[3]  Robert Wynne substituted into appellant's case and the public defender was relieved.  Trial date remained set for June 27. 


                      On June 16, the trial date was vacated and reset to July 18 at Wynne's request. 


                      On Thursday, July 14, Wynne spoke to the prosecutor and told him that he wanted â€





Description Appellant was convicted after jury trial of first degree murder and being a felon in possession of a firearm. (Pen. Code, SS 187, subdivision (a), 1202.1). A special allegation that appellant personally discharged a firearm, causing death, was found true. ( S 12022.53, subd. (d).) Appellant admitted a prior strike allegation. ( SS 667, subds. (a) (i), 1170.12, subds. (a) (e).) He was sentenced to 80 years to life imprisonment.
Appellant contends the court prejudicially erred by refusing his attorney's request for a trial continuance. Court disagree and affirm.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale