P. v. Thompson
Filed 6/7/06 P. v. Thompson CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARDY THOMPSON, Defendant and Appellant. | E039356 (Super.Ct.No. FSB046477) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Arthur A. Harrison, Judge. Affirmed.
Beatrice C. Tillman, under appointment for the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Ardy Thompson pled nolo contendere to forcible rape (Pen. Code § 261, subd.(a)(2)) and admitted he used a handgun during the crime (Pen. Code § 12022.53,
subd.(b)). He also admitted having suffered a strike prior. (Pen. Code § 667, subds.(b)-(i).) As part of his plea bargain, he waived his right to appeal. He was sentenced to the agreed-to term of 16 years in prison.[1] His request for a certificate of probable cause was denied by the trial court.
Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
The defendant has filed a four-page supplemental letter brief which was read and considered.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
RAMIREZ
P.J.
We concur:
HOLLENHORST
J.
KING
J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Apartment Manager Lawyers.
[1] As part of his plea bargain, on the day he was sentenced, he waived, in writing, his right to â€
