P. v. Tia
Filed 4/17/06 P. v. Tia CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RODNEY FULUFULU TIA, Defendant and Appellant. | G035072 (Super. Ct. No. 04SF0806) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Susanne S. Shaw, Judge. Reversed.
Brent Riggs, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey J. Koch and Robert M. Foster, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * *
A jury convicted Rodney Tia (defendant) of two counts petty theft with a prior conviction. (Pen. Code, §§ 488, 666; all further statutory references are to the Penal Code.) Defendant admitted the truth of eight prior felony conviction allegations within the meaning of the â€