legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Troyano

P. v. Troyano
08:28:2006

P. v. Troyano




Filed 8/25/06 P. v. Troyano CA3





NOT TO BE PUBLISHED


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA




THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT



(Yuba)













THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


CARLOS MANUEL TROYANO,


Defendant and Appellant.



C049899



(Super. Ct. Nos. CRF02656 & CRF04125)





Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant Carlos Manuel Troyano pleaded guilty to transporting methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a).)[1] Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was granted probation pursuant to Proposition 36 (§ 1210.1), on the condition, among others, that he pay a $200 restitution fine


(§ 1202.4).


Defendant admitted violating the conditions of his probation by failing to satisfactorily participate in his substance abuse treatment program and obey all laws. His probation was revoked and he was sentenced to four years in state prison (the upper term) and ordered to pay a $400 restitution fine and a $400 parole revocation fine.


One week after sentencing defendant, the trial court issued the following minute order: â€





Description A criminal law decision regarding transporting methamphetamine.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale