P. v. Tyler

Filed 9/28/06 P. v. Tyler CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

Richard S. Tyler appeals from a judgment placing him on felony probation after a jury convicted him of possessing methamphetamine for sale and returned a true finding that the substance possessed was in a crystalline form. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378, subd. (a); Pen. Code, § 1170.74.)

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting this court to independently review the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We advised appellant that he had 30 days in which to submit a written brief or letter stating any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider. Appellant filed a letter brief raising a number of issues.

We have examined the record and considered the points raised in appellant's letter brief. We are satisfied that appellant's appointed appellate counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

COFFEE, J.

We concur:

YEGAN, Acting P.J.

PERREN, J.

Charles S. Crandall, Judge

Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo

______________________________

Wayne C. Tobin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line Lawyers.