legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ulloa

P. v. Ulloa
02:24:2007

P


P. v. Ulloa


Filed 2/21/07  P. v. Ulloa CA6


 


 


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


 


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b).  This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


THE PEOPLE,                                                                       H030533


                        Plaintiff and Respondent,                             (Santa Clara County


                                                                                                 Superior Court


            v.                                                                                 No. CC513651)


HENRY ULLOA,


                        Defendant and Appellant.


_____________________________________/


            The sole contention on appeal is that the trial court's imposition of a $400 restitution fund fine was a violation of an alleged plea bargain.  We conclude that there was no plea bargain and the imposition of the fine did not violate the plea â€





Description The sole contention on appeal is that the trial court's imposition of a $400 restitution fund fine was a violation of an alleged plea bargain. Court conclude that there was no plea bargain and the imposition of the fine did not violate the plea "understanding."
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale