P. v. Vizcarra

Filed 7/24/06 P. v. Vizcarra CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

Jose Luciano Vizcarra was placed on felony probation after pleading no contest to a single count of carrying a concealed firearm in a vehicle in violation of Penal Code section 12025, subdivision (a)(1). He appeals from an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to prison for the 16-month lower term following his admission of a probation violation.

We appointed counsel to represent Vizcarra in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting this court to independently review the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We advised Vizcarra that he had 30 days in which to submit a written brief or letter stating any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider. No letter or brief has been filed.

We have examined the record and are satisfied that Vizcarra's appointed appellate counsel has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

COFFEE, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

YEGAN, J.

Charles Horan, Judge

Superior Court County of Los Angeles

______________________________

Kathleen M. Redmond, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Real Estate Attorney.