legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wells

P. v. Wells
10:24:2006

P. v. Wells



Filed 10/4/06 P. v. Wells CA2/6






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION SIX










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


RICKY WELLS,


Defendant and Appellant.



2d Crim. No. B188753


(Super. Ct. No. TA082040)


(Los Angeles County)




Ricky Wells appeals from the judgment entered after he pleaded no contest to possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)) and admitted one prior strike conviction (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (a)(1), (d)(1), (e)(1), 1170.12, subds. (b)(1), (c)(1)). He was sentenced to two years eight months in state prison, consisting of the low term of 16 months, doubled for the strike prior.


We appointed counsel to represent Wells in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting that this court independently examine the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.


On July 17, 2006, we advised Wells that he had 30 days in which to submit a written brief or letter stating any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider. Wells did not respond.


We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Wells's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)


The judgment is affirmed.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.


PERREN, J.


We concur:


YEGAN, Acting P.J.


COFFEE, J.


Ron Slick, Judge



Superior Court County of Los Angeles



______________________________




Dennis L. Cava, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.


Analysis and review provided by Escondido Property line Lawyers.





Description Defendant appeals from the judgment entered after he pleaded no contest to possession of a controlled substance and admitted one prior strike conviction. Defendant was sentenced to two years eight months in state prison, consisting of the low term of 16 months, doubled for the prior strike.
The court reviewed the entire record and is satisfied that defendant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. Judgment Affirmed.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale