P. v. Williams
Filed 3/9/06 P. v. Williams CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEITH DEWRON WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. | E039227 (Super.Ct.No. SWF011877) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Judith C. Clark, Judge. Affirmed.
Leslie A. Rose, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
On October 27, 2005, in case number SWF011877, the defendant, represented by counsel, pled guilty to violations of Health and Safety Code, sections 11379, subdivision (a), transportation of a controlled substance, and 11378, subdivision (a), possession for sale of a controlled substance, as charged in counts one and two. The defendant also admitted the special allegations charged pursuant to Health and Safety code section 11370.2, subdivision (c) of the information filed by the District Attorney of Riverside County.
Thereafter the defendant was committed to state prison for five years and awarded the appropriate custody credits. In accordance with the negotiated disposition, counts three and four were dismissed on motion of the district attorney. (Pen. Code, § 1385.)
Defendant appealed and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493], setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
The defendant filed a two-page supplemental brief, which was read and considered.
We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RAMIREZ
P.J.
We concur:
HOLLENHORST
J.
McKINSTER
J.
Publication courtesy of Santee Immigration Attorney (http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/) And Santee Lawyers Directory (http://www.fearnotlaw.com/ )
