Filed 3/27/18 P. v. Willmon CA5








NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT


THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

WILL THOMAS WILLMON,

Defendant and Appellant.


F074822

(Super. Ct. No. 1485674)


OPINION

THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Shawn D. Bessey, Judge.
Jennifer A. Gibson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appointed counsel for defendant Will Thomas Willmon asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We sent a letter to defendant, advising him of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Defendant did not respond. On review, we find no arguable issues.
We provide the following brief description of the factual and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On October 27, 2013, defendant was released from incarceration. He was informed that he was required to register as a sex offender upon his release. Although defendant was repeatedly reminded to register as a sex offender, he still failed to do so, and was finally arrested on March 17, 2015.
On May 26, 2016, defendant was convicted by bench trial of failure to register upon release from custody (Pen. Code, §§ 290.015, subd. (a), 290.018, subd. (b); count 1) and failure to update his annual registration (§ 290.015; count 2). The trial court also found defendant had suffered a prior conviction under section 290, making his two current convictions felonies (§ 290.018, subd. (b)).
In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true allegations that defendant had suffered four prior felony convictions within the meaning of the “Three Strikes” law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)) and had served four prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)).
At the sentencing hearing on November 1, 2016, the trial court struck three of the four prior felony conviction allegations. The court sentenced defendant to eight years in prison and imposed various fines and fees.
On December 8, 2016, defendant filed a notice of appeal.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel or any other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.