P. v. Woods
Filed 7/24/06 P. v. Woods CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BOBBY WAYNE WOODS, Defendant and Appellant. | C051083
(Super. Ct. No. 05F01883)
|
Defendant Bobby Wayne Woods entered a negotiated plea of no contest to first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459)[1] and first degree robbery (§ 211) and admitted personally inflicting great bodily injury in the commission of the robbery (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)) in exchange for a stipulated term of seven years four months in prison and the dismissal of the remaining counts and allegations. Defendant was sentenced to an aggregate term of seven years four months in accordance with his plea, with credit for 201 days served. The trial court imposed a restitution fine of $1,600 (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)) and suspended an additional restitution fine in the same amount pending successful completion of parole (§ 1202.45). Defendant was also ordered to pay victim restitution in the amount of $35,194 and to provide specimens for law enforcement identification analysis. (§ 296.)
Defendant appeals. The record does not reflect that he obtained a certificate of probable cause. (§ 1237.5.)
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant.
Our review has disclosed a minor error on the abstract of judgment. Defendant's conduct credits were calculated pursuant to section 2933.1. Item 13 must be corrected to so indicate.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to correct the abstract of judgment and to forward a certified copy of the corrected abstract to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
RAYE , J.
We concur:
SCOTLAND , P.J.
NICHOLSON , J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Real Estate Lawyers.
[1] All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.
