Filed 12/22/05 P. v. Ayala CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
RICHARD DANIEL AYALA,
Defendant and Appellant.
| B179659
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VA083951) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Raul A. Sahagun, Judge. Affirmed.
________
Jennifer L. Peabody, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Marc E. Turchin and Jack Newman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
________
A jury convicted Richard Ayala of possessing and being under the influence of methamphetamine (counts 1 and 2) and possessing a pipe for smoking drugs (count 3). (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11377, subd. (a); 11364, subd. (a); 11550 subd. (a).) In a bifurcated hearing after waiving his rights, defendant admitted that he had one â€
Description | Criminal law decision relating to conviction of possesion of methamphetamine. |
Rating |