legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. BELLACOSA

PEOPLE v. BELLACOSA
02:24:2007

PEOPLE v


PEOPLE v. BELLACOSA


 


 


 


Filed 2/15/07


CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(El Dorado)







THE PEOPLE,


          Plaintiff and Appellant,


     v.


CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN BELLACOSA,


          Defendant and Respondent.



C049291


(Super. Ct. No. S04CRF0293)



     APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County, Richard K. Specchio and Jerald M. Lasarow, Judges.  Reversed.


     Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Senior Assistant Attorney General, John G. McLean and George M. Hendrickson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


     Law Office of Steven Bailey and Steven C. Bailey for Defendant and Respondent.


     Having evaded a pursuing deputy sheriff in South Lake Tahoe by  crossing the border into Nevada, defendant Christopher Bellacosa evaded prosecution in California when the El Dorado County Superior Court dismissed a complaint charging him with felony driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and eluding a peace officer while driving with willful and wanton disregard for the safety of persons and property.  The court ruled that  because defendant was convicted in Nevada for DUI and attempting to elude Nevada officers who took up the chase after he crossed the border, his prosecution in California is barred by Penal Code section 656, which states the fact that a defendant has been acquitted or convicted in federal court, or  in a  court of another state or territory of the United States, â€





Description Where defendant's acts of driving while intoxicated and evading peace officers across California Nevada state line constituted continuous course of conduct during which he first violated laws of California and then violated laws of Nevada, physical acts he committed in California were not the same physical acts he committed in Nevada, thus his convictions in Nevada for his conduct in Nevada did not, under Penal Code Sec. 656, preclude his prosecution in California for his conduct in California even though some of the elements of the offenses overlap.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale