PEOPLE v. BRADY
Filed 8/9/10
IN THE SUPREME
COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff
and Respondent, )
) S078404
v. )
)
ROGER HOAN BRADY, )
) Los
Angeles County
Defendant
and Appellant. ) Super. Ct.
No. YA020910
__________________________________ )
Story continued from part II…..
(a) Christmas
The jury viewed a four-minute, edited
videotape depicting Officer Ganz celebrating
Christmas, two days before his murder, with his family. It consisted primarily of Officer Ganz handing out presents to one of his sisters and some of
his young nieces and nephews, who excitedly opened the gifts. At one point, Officer Ganz
and his sister hug.
This videotape depicted a rather
ordinary event--a family holiday celebration.
It is a brief â€
| Description | A jury convicted defendant Roger Hoan Brady of the first degree murder of Officer Martin Ganz of the Manhattan Beach Police Department. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189.)[1] It found true special circumstance allegations that the murder was committed against a peace officer engaged in the performance of his duties (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(7)) and for the purpose of avoiding or preventing a lawful arrest (id., subd. (a)(5)); it also found true a special circumstance allegation that defendant had previously been convicted of murder (id., subd. (a)(2)). The jury further found that defendant had personally used a firearm in the commission of the offense. (§ 12022.5, subd. (a).) The jury returned a verdict of death. The trial court denied the automatic application to modify the verdict (§ 190.4, subd. (e)) and sentenced defendant to death. This appeal is automatic. (§ 1239, subd. (b).) Court affirm the judgment. |
| Rating |
