legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. GAGIK KARAPETYAN

PEOPLE v. GAGIK KARAPETYAN
06:28:2006

PEOPLE v. GAGIK KARAPETYAN








Filed 6/27/06





CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT


(Sacramento)








THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


GAGIK KARAPETYAN,


Defendant and Appellant.



C048289



(Super. Ct. No. 03F07499)





APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, James L. Long, J. Affirmed.


Mark L. Christiansen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and J. Robert Jibson and Jesse Witt, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


On September 2, 2003, at approximately 11:00 p.m., Sacramento Police Officer Barry Lee responded to a reported stabbing. Upon arrival, he found the victim Andrey Tsurkanu already dead with six men surrounding the body. Several days later, defendant Gagik Karapetyan walked into a sheriff's department substation and confessed to killing Andrey. He was tried and convicted of second degree murder.


Defendant appeals contending the trial court erred: (1) when it instructed the jury that an aider and abettor to assault could be liable for murder if death was a natural and probable consequence of the assault, (2) when it admitted evidence of a prior incident, (3) when it admitted defendant's statement that he used a knife, and (4) by not instructing the jury on imperfect defense of others. We affirm.


FACTS AND PROCEDURE


On September 2, 2003, Andrey Tsurkanu and his cousin Sergey Melnichuk went to Pavel Tveretinov's auto auction to pick up a friend who worked there.[1] The friend was not there when they arrived, so Andrey and Sergey waited. Defendant, his son-in-law Ararat Manakyan, and Isaak Ambaryan were barbequing in the area. Sergey peeked into defendant's motor home, which was near the barbeque, and defendant became upset, telling him not to look in. Isaak told Sergey to tell Andrey, â€





Description A decision as to whether an aider and abettor to assaultto assault could be liable for murder if death was a natural and probable consequence of the assault.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale