legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. LOMAX Part-II

PEOPLE v. LOMAX Part-II
08:26:2010



PEOPLE v










PEOPLE v. LOMAX

















Filed 7/1/10















IN THE SUPREME
COURT OF
CALIFORNIA







THE PEOPLE, )

)

Plaintiff
and Respondent, )

) S057321

v. )

)

DARREL LEE LOMAX, )


)
Los
Angeles County

Defendant
and Appellant. ) Super. Ct.
No. NA023819

__________________________________ )







Story continued from part I…..







On August 28, 1995, Deputy Public Defender Isaacson asked for
the addresses of all witnesses, including penalty phase witnesses in Oregon. These addresses had been redacted from the
police reports given to the defense. The
prosecutor responded that the civilian witnesses were reluctant to be contacted
because they were â€




Description A jury convicted defendant of two robberies, with a murder in the course of the second. It found he had used a firearm in all the offenses and found true a robbery-murder special circumstance. Because the jury set the penalty at death, this appeal is automatic. Court affirm.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale